The Supreme Court can still invalidate the newest national injunction and allow the order to go into effect anywhere it is ...

President Donald Trump hailed the Supreme Court decision as a "big win." But it still leaves the fate birthright citizenship unclear. However, it does limit nationwide injunctions by individual ...

Reactions to landmark SCOTUS rulings The Court limits blocking of Trump’s executive orders, risking end of birthright citizenship in some areas. Another ruling allows parents to opt kids out of ...

The 6-3 ruling changed the status quo on universal injunctions, limiting the power of lower-level courts to issue injunctions ...

Houston organizations and officials react to Supreme Court limiting nationwide injunctions, leaving the future of birthright citizenship restrictions unclear.

How the Birthright Citizenship and Nationwide Injunctions Case Began The dispute before the court was prompted by an order President Trump signed on his first day back in the White House.

Voices: Birthright citizenship is deeply rooted in Black American history, and it should remain in place We must travel back in time and revisit when the 14th Amendment was created — and for ...

President Trump's order that would end automatic citizenship for the children of many categories of immigrants has been blocked from going into effect by three separate federal judges. Those ...

The divided court ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions but left open the possibility that the birthright citizenship changes could remain blocked nationwide.

The birthright citizenship legal challenge at the Supreme Court is not a minor adjustment to immigration policy, but a fundamental redefinition of citizenship itself.

All but two countries in the Americas grant automatic birthright citizenship to people born within their borders, but that isn't the norm everywhere.