There is local reaction to Friday's landmark ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court.There are two parts to the ruling: The overall decision to limit power by lower co ...

The 6-3 ruling changed the status quo on universal injunctions, limiting the power of lower-level courts to issue injunctions ...

FILE - Mairelise Robinson, a U.S. citizen who is 6 months pregnant, attends a protest in support of birthright citizenship, outside of the Supreme Court in Washington, May 15, 2025. (AP ...

Houston organizations and officials react to Supreme Court limiting nationwide injunctions, leaving the future of birthright ...

Those injunctions have been upheld by three separate appeals courts.So Thursday's case at the Supreme Court was really about two questions: Whether the constitution guarantees birthright ...

The divided court ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions but left open the possibility that the birthright citizenship changes could remain blocked nationwide.

The 14th Amendment erased that finding and expanded citizenship to almost anyone born in the United States. In 1898, the justices again considered birthright citizenship in the case of Wong Kim Ark .

America is at a crossroads. In light of the events taking place in our community, state and country, there has been nothing, in my view, more important than the debate on birthright citizenship.

The right to automatic U.S. citizenship at birth was enshrined by the 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868 in the wake of the Civil War.It granted full citizenship to formerly enslaved people and ...

The birthright citizenship legal challenge at the Supreme Court is not a minor adjustment to immigration policy, but a fundamental redefinition of citizenship itself.

Birthright citizenship worries Michigan immigrant community by: Taryn Simmons. Posted: May 20, 2025 / 10:46 AM EDT. Updated: May 20, 2025 / 10:46 AM EDT.